<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can someone put these medical ethic directives in a simpler for for me to undeerstand and discuss?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.medicalsupplyservices.com/blog/can-someone-put-these-medical-ethic-directives-in-a-simpler-for-for-me-to-undeerstand-and-discuss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.medicalsupplyservices.com/blog/can-someone-put-these-medical-ethic-directives-in-a-simpler-for-for-me-to-undeerstand-and-discuss/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: keengrrl76</title>
		<link>http://www.medicalsupplyservices.com/blog/can-someone-put-these-medical-ethic-directives-in-a-simpler-for-for-me-to-undeerstand-and-discuss/comment-page-1/#comment-2203</link>
		<dc:creator>keengrrl76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.medicalsupplyservices.com/blog/can-someone-put-these-medical-ethic-directives-in-a-simpler-for-for-me-to-undeerstand-and-discuss/#comment-2203</guid>
		<description>I think it's just too long of a question/answer for people to really have the time or desire to tackle it.

One thing that could help you is if you remove the ones that are more obvious and you do understand, and also break them down into many questions.  Maybe only include one or two, but at most three of the directives in each question.

Some of these seem almost silly, and things the medical community has already established (so no need for a directive).  LIke #62 - that is the law.  #63 - Any hospital receiving federal money is mandated by law to offer the option of organ donation to families. # 64 - That is the law, on both counts.  # 65 That is standard practice at all hospitals.  # 66 - Abortions generally happen at clinics, and they don't have tissue banks or sell to tissue banks.  No transplant center would use tissue from an aborted fetus because it simply is not an option.  It would be like the directives saying: No circus clown may perform open heart surgery with their elephants in the room.&lt;a href="http://www.supersportsstore.com/essentials-7767"&gt; keengrrl76&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s just too long of a question/answer for people to really have the time or desire to tackle it.</p>
<p>One thing that could help you is if you remove the ones that are more obvious and you do understand, and also break them down into many questions.  Maybe only include one or two, but at most three of the directives in each question.</p>
<p>Some of these seem almost silly, and things the medical community has already established (so no need for a directive).  LIke #62 - that is the law.  #63 - Any hospital receiving federal money is mandated by law to offer the option of organ donation to families. # 64 - That is the law, on both counts.  # 65 That is standard practice at all hospitals.  # 66 - Abortions generally happen at clinics, and they don&#8217;t have tissue banks or sell to tissue banks.  No transplant center would use tissue from an aborted fetus because it simply is not an option.  It would be like the directives saying: No circus clown may perform open heart surgery with their elephants in the room.<a href="http://www.supersportsstore.com/essentials-7767"> keengrrl76</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

